Guest blog courtesy of Dropzone AI.SOAR helps MSSPs automate routine security tasks but fails to handle complex investigations, multi-step attack chains, and real-time decision-making. Static playbooks require constant updates and struggle with nuanced threats, leaving analysts to fill in the gaps manually. This article covers how AI SOC analysts go beyond SOAR, automating full investigations, reducing manual workload, and enabling MSSPs to scale efficiently. You’ll learn how AI improves accuracy, integrates seamlessly with existing workflows, and unlocks new business opportunities without increasing operational overhead.AI SOC analysts deliver structured, in-depth reports so your team gets the necessary context before deciding to escalate an alert to a client. No more chasing down missing details or manually pulling logs from multiple platforms. Every investigation includes past user behavior, correlation with similar events, and a clear summary of what happened, why it matters, and what action to take. This speeds up your response time and gives your clients the confidence that every alert is handled thoroughly.
The Limitations of SOAR for MSSPs
Challenges with SOAR Playbooks
SOAR playbooks are built for structured, rule-based workflows. They work well when an action needs to be triggered based on clear conditions, such as blocking an IP after a malware signature is detected. If you can write an activity into your policies, it’s probably a good candidate for SOAR automation.However, SOAR and hyperautomation platforms struggle with scenarios that require deeper analysis, where an alert can’t be resolved with a simple "if X, then do Y" rule. Investigations often require looking beyond static rules to understand user behavior, access patterns, and historical activity, which playbooks are not designed to handle.Another challenge is maintaining SOAR playbooks. Due to constantly evolving threats and client environments, playbooks require frequent updates to stay relevant.Managing these updates is time-consuming and requires dedicated resources. If a playbook is outdated or doesn’t account for the nuances of a specific environment, it can lead to false positives, missed threats, and wasted analyst time due to the automation failing.Impact on MSSPs
Managing and maintaining SOAR playbooks at scale takes valuable time, which could be spent improving detection strategies or focusing on proactive security projects that enhance security posture.Playbooks require constant tuning, and as MSSPs add more clients with unique environments, the complexity increases exponentially. This slows operations and makes scaling harder without dedicating more resources to automation management.SOAR’s limitations also mean analysts must still intervene in more complex investigations, such as those that require looking up and analyzing historical activity to detect anomalies. If an alert doesn’t match a predefined workflow, it is placed in a queue for manual review.This creates bottlenecks, increases response times, and adds to analyst fatigue. Without automation that can autonomously handle deeper investigative work, MSSPs risk missing real threats or spending too much time on alerts that should have been resolved faster.AI SOC Analysts: A New Frontier in Alert Investigation Automation
How AI SOC Analysts Go Beyond SOAR Capabilities
If you’ve worked with SOAR, you know its strengths and limits. It’s great for automating routine tasks, but when an alert requires deeper investigation, SOAR playbooks fall short. They rely on fixed decision trees, meaning anything outside those predefined workflows still ends up in your queue.However, AI SOC analysts don’t just automate pre-defined tasks; they think through investigations like your team would. Instead of stopping at a simple enrichment step, these AI agents follow the same investigative methodology human analysts use, like OSCAR. They pull up logs, check permissions and changes, examine access patterns, review file hashes, analyze payload execution, and simulate follow-ups like interviewing users performing the same detailed steps a human analyst would. This means fewer false escalations and fewer manual investigations interrupting your team’s time.Advantages for MSSPs
You deal with alerts that don’t always fit into a predictable pattern. AI SOC analysts handle those cases automatically. They analyze complex, low-frequency alerts that SOAR can’t process, performing investigative steps that go beyond basic enrichment, such as:- Pulling data from SIEMs and security tools to gather logs and relevant telemetry.
- Checking user authentication patterns to detect unusual or suspicious activity.
- Investigating recent changes to user accounts or permissions for signs of privilege misuse.
- Tracing process trees to identify and analyze malicious execution attempts.
- Validating file hashes against threat intelligence feeds to confirm known threats.
- Looking up domain and IP reputations to assess potential malicious connections.